There
are two processes available to challenge a physical inspection
score: technical reviews and database adjustments. The qualifications
for technical reviews and database adjustments are different.
PIH-REAC
has provided technical review guidelines in the Federal Register
at 24 CFR Part 200.857
and 24 CFR Part 902.68. Guidelines
for requesting a database adjustment are available online by
clicking here . Back
to top
What is a Technical Review?
A technical review may be requested if, following review of
the physical inspection results and score, an objectively verifiable
and material error(s) occurred in the inspection that, if corrected,
will result in an improvement in the property's overall score.
For
example, PIH-REAC may grant a technical review for inspections
in which the inspector recorded a deficiency that did not exist
at the time of the inspection. Please see the following sections
for specific technical review criteria and examples. Back
to top
What Qualifies for a Technical Review?
Only objectively verifiable, material errors will be considered
for a technical review. Material errors are those that exhibit
specific characteristics and meet specific thresholds. The three
types of material errors are:
-
Building Data Errors- The inspection includes the wrong
building or a building that is not owned by the property.
-
Unit Count Errors- The total number of units considered
in scoring is incorrect as reported at the time of the inspection.
-
Non-Existent Deficiency Errors- The inspection cites a
deficiency that did not exist at the time of the inspection.
Back to top
What
Does NOT Qualify for a Technical Review?
PIH-REAC will not consider the following for a technical review:
-
disagreements over the severity of a defect, such as deficiencies
rated Level 3 that the property owner thinks should be rated
Level 1; or
-
deficiencies that were repaired or corrected during or after
the inspection.
Technical
reviews do not apply to circumstances addressed by the database
adjustment process. Requests for database adjustments must be
submitted separately from requests for technical reviews. The
following issues should be forwarded separately as a database
adjustment request:
-
Local conditions and exceptions - inconsistencies between
local code requirements and PIH-REAC physical inspection protocol;
-
Ownership issues - items the property owner or agent does
not own and is not responsible for maintaining that were captured
and scored during the inspection, and the POA/PHA has notified
the proper authorities regarding the deficient structure;
-
Adverse conditions beyond the owner's control - deficiencies
that were caused by circumstances beyond the owner's control,
such as damage from a natural disaster or third party; and
- Modernization
work in progress - property undergoing modernization work/construction.
Back to top
What
are the Steps for Submitting a Technical Review?
A POA/PHA can initiate the technical review process by notifying
PIH-REAC in writing within the appropriate time period and supplying
reasonable evidence. Please read the following steps prior to
submitting a technical review.
Timeline
for Submittal |
1.
Submission
requirements differ for each housing program:
|
|
-
Public Housing - PHAs must submit a request for
a technical review within 15 days following PIH-REAC's
submission of the physical inspection report to the
PHA.
|
| |
- Multifamily
Housing-
POAs
must submit a request for a technical review within
30 days following REAC's submission of the physical
inspection report to the owner of the Multifamily Housing
property.
|
| |
REAC
is not required to review a technical review request after
the specified number of days has expired.
|
| What
to Include |
2. Include
all property identification, i.e. property name, property
identification number, the Inspection Summary Report number,
and specific information relevant to your request. Address
general comments about the UPCS inspection protocol, as
well as requests for database adjustment, in separate correspondence.
3. Include all location information (inspectable
area, building number, unit number, etc.) for each deficiency
presented in the request for review. |
| Documenting
your Request |
4.
All requests for technical review must include documentation
to sufficiently support the request. Appropriate documentation
must be objectively verifiable and includes one or
a combination of the following:
- Written
Material- Letters from objective sources, such as
a local fire marshal or building code official, are
considered to be appropriate documentation. These documents
should detail the exact location of the variance (such
as building address and unit number).
-
Photographs- All photographs must clearly show
the element(s) in question, and accurately reflect the
inspectable area and item. Label each photograph with
the date and location. Please be aware that many facsimiles
are unclear, difficult for the reviewer to assess as
documentation, and may be rejected as a result.
-
Videos- As with photographs, videos must accurately
reflect the entire inspectable area or item. All videos
should include the date and specific location.
|
| Where
to Send your Request |
5. Be sure to send the information and documentation
for a technical review to the following address: |
|
Attn:
PASS Technical Reviews
HUD/PIH/REAC
550 12th Street S.W.
Suite 100
Washington, DC 20410 |
What
Can Be Expected in Response?
If the PIH-REAC evaluation determines that an objectively verifiable
and material error(s) has been reasonably documented by the
POA/PHA and, if corrected, would result in a significant improvement
in the property's overall score, the PIH-REAC shall take one
or a combination of the following actions:
-
Schedule a new inspection;
-
Correct the physical inspection report;
-
Issue a corrected physical condition score; or
- Issue a corrected Public Housing Assessment System (PHAS)
score.
A
notification letter will be sent to the POA/PHA explaining what
action, if any, has occurred and why the technical review is
accepted or denied.
A
technical review that changes a physical inspection score may
change the PHAS score. The PHAS score is not considered final
until all changes have been completed. Back
to top
View
a Standard Submisson Format
All POAs/PHAs are encouraged to use the standardized format,
outlining the data required for a technical review, to expedite
the process. View the standardized
format. Back
to top
View
File Format(.pdf) ______________________________________________________