|
 |
|
|
 |
Supplemental
Guidance on Phase-in Management Fees |
 |
|
PurposeIn
accordance with PIH
Notice 2007-9, issued April 10, 2007, PHAs are not required to comply with
the reasonableness requirements for management fees in the first year of project-based
budgeting and accounting (i.e., the transition year). Further, PHAs can obtain
an additional two-year phase-in of management fees, subject to: - The PHA
reasonably documents current fees needed to support operations at current organizational
levels,
- PHA presents a schedule to achieve fee reasonableness by 2011,
and
- The request, including items 1 and 2, above, is included in the PHA's
Annual Plan.
The following provides additional guidance to Field Offices
and PHAs regarding the documentation to be included in the Annual Plan with regard
to these phase-in fees.
Note: The special phase-in provisions outlined
in this document are not applicable to agencies demonstrating successful conversion
to asset management to stop their losses under the new Operating Fund formula,
i.e., Stop-Loss.
Safe Harbor Phase-in SchedulesThe Department recognizes
that many PHAs require substantial organizational changes in transitioning to
the fee-for-service model. The Department further recognizes that the reduction
in overhead necessary to comply with fee reasonableness may not necessarily occur
in a linear progression, with, say, a one-third reduction in the first year, a
two-thirds reduction in the second year, and the remaining reduction in the third
year. Consequently, the Department will consider as reasonable any phase-in schedule
of management fees that meets the following: - 20% progress towards meeting
the fee schedules in Year 2,
- 40% progress in meeting the fee schedules
in Year 3, and
- full compliance by Year 4.
ExampleAssume
that the "allowable" management fee for a particular PHA is $42.50 per unit month
(PUM). Additionally, the PHA can charge $7.50 PUM in a bookkeeping fee and $10
PUM in an asset management fee, for a total of combined fees of $60 PUM. The PHA's
current overhead costs attributed to the public housing program, for Year 1, are
$90 PUM, or a difference of $30 PUM. In this case, the PHA could submit a schedule
showing collective fees of $84 PUM in Year 2 ($90 - (.2 x $30)), $78 PUM in Year
3 ($90 - (.4 x $30)), and $60 PUM in Year 4. ProcessAny phase-in schedule
submitted with a PHA's Annual Plan that is consistent with the above safe harbor
will be considered reasonable and approved as part of the PHA Annual Plan.Sample
Annual Plan LanguageThe following is an example of the language that would
be expected to be included in the Annual Plan for a PHA electing to implement
the phase-in fees, following the guidelines presented above. The
Duncan Housing Authority (DHA) elects to phase-in its management fees through
2011. Currently, the overhead charged to the public housing program is $90 PUM,
based on most recent financial statements (FYE 2008). The allowable management
fees for the DHA are as follows:Management Fees -- $42.50 PUM Bookkeeping
Fee -- $7.50 PUM Asset Management Fee -- $10.00 PUM Total -- $60 PUM The
difference between the current overhead costs, $90 PUM, and the allowable fee
schedules, is $30 PUM. The DHA proposes the following phase-in schedule:
Schedule
of Phased-in Management Fees for DHA 2008
(Initial Year of Project Based Budgeting and Accounting | 2009
(Year 2) | 2010
(Year 3) | 2011
(Year 4, first year of full compliance) | $90
PUM | $84
PUM | $78
PUM | $60
PUM |
Year-End Financial ReportingFor
purposes of year-end Financial Data Schedule (FDS) reporting, a PHA that adopts
phase-in fees should first charge the permitted bookkeeping fee. Then, subject
to excess cash rules, the PHA should charge the permitted asset management fee.
The balance shall be reported on the Management Fee line item. (In the case of
the above example, in Year 2 the PHA, assuming it had sufficient excess cash,
would report $10 PUM in asset management fee, $7.50 PUM in bookkeeping fee, and
the remaining amount, $66.50 PUM, under the management fee line item.)
Alternatives
to Safe Harbor Phase-in SchedulesAs an alternative to the safe harbor management
fee phase-in schedules outlined in this document, a PHA can either: (1) maintain
overhead allocations for overhead costs in lieu of fee-for-service through 2011
(see below) or (2) request an alternative phase-in schedule that will be reviewed
by HUD Headquarters/Financial Management Division. In the case of PHAs that pursue
the second option, they should indicate, as an attachment to the Annual Plan,
that they are submitting a request for phase-in fees that are higher than the
safe harbor schedule. Field Office approval of the Annual Plan represents approval
of the PHA's intent to submit to HUD Headquarters a phase-in schedule that exceeds
the safe harbor amounts.
Requests for phase-in fees that exceed the safe
harbor amounts must include appropriate supporting documentation and should be
mailed to: Andrea
Williamson, Financial Management Division, Real Estate Assessment Center,
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 550 12th St., SW, Washington,
D.C., 20410. Ms. Williamson can be reached by
email at: Andrea.D.Williamson@hud.gov. Use
of Allocated Overhead in lieu of Phased-in Management FeesAs indicated above,
through 2011, a PHA that has overhead costs that exceed allowable management fees
can either utilize the phased-in management fees or it can continue to maintain
overhead allocations. If a PHA maintains overhead allocations, it will report
that allocated overhead on the income statement for each project under a new FDS
line item called "Allocated Overhead." For those PHAs that implement this provision,
please note that: - Only overhead costs should be reported on "Allocated
Overhead" line item. Other direct project costs, such as the salary of the maintenance
staff or costs associated with administering the waiting list must be appropriately
reflected on the project's income statement.
- Allocated overhead expenses,
as opposed to management fees, are covered under all applicable Federal program
rules. Unlike management fees, they are not "de-federalized."
- A PHA that
maintains allocated overhead (as opposed to fee-for-service) will not create a
Central Office Cost Center (COCC). Instead, it shall maintain the internal overhead
accounting documentation that supports the allocated overhead amounts .
|
|
 |