|
| Date:
July 10, 1992 |
Letter
No. LR-92-01
|
| Subject: |
Applicability of Federal wage rate requirements to prison
inmates engaged in HUD-assisted maintenance or construction
work |
This
responds to inquiries as to whether prison inmates can be utilized
to perform public or Indian housing authority maintenance or construction
work or other HUD-assisted construction work at less than the Federal
prevailing wage rates.
There is no prohibition against the use of prison inmate
labor on maintenance or construction work in either the legislation
authorizing HUD-assisted construction or maintenance work (e.g.,
the U. S. Housing Act of 1937, National Housing Act, Housing Act
of 1959, Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, each as
amended) or in 24 CFR Part 85, Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and Federally Recognized
Indian Tribal Governments. At the same time, there is no exemption
from the payment of Federal prevailing wage rates based on the use
of prison inmate laborers or mechanics.
Federal prevailing wage requirements governing public and Indian
housing maintenance and construction are found at Section 12(a)
of the U. S. Housing Act (USHA) of 1937. Section 12(a) requires
the payment of HUD-determined prevailing wages to "all
maintenance laborers and mechanics employed in the operation, of
the low-income housing project involved" and the payment of
Davis-Bacon wage rates to "all laborers and mechanics
employed in the development of the project involved (including a
project with nine or more units assisted under section 8 of this
Act...)" (emphasis added). Similar labor standards provisions
requiring the payment of Davis-Bacon wage rates for other housing
programs are found at Section 212(a) of the National Housing
Act, Section 202(j)(5)(A) of the Housing Act of 1959, and
Section 286(a) of the National Affordable Housing Act (NAHA)
as it pertains to the HOME program. Lastly, Section 110(a)
of the Housing and Community Development Act (HCDA) of 1974 requires
that "All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or
subcontractors in the performance of construction work financed
in whole or in part with assistance received under this title..."
shall be paid not less than the wages determined to be prevailing
by the Secretary of Labor in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act.
Some exemptions from Federal prevailing wage requirements, based
on factors other than the use of prison labor, may be operable in
certain cases. For example, some statutory labor standards provisions
contain a unit threshold under which the wage requirements do
not apply. In those cases where the "project" fails
to meet the unit threshold, the construction work including work
performed by prison inmate laborers and mechanics is exempt
from Davis-Bacon wage rate coverage. Additionally, since Section
110(a) of the HCDA applies to laborers and mechanics employed by
"contractors or subcontractors", it is possible that in
certain circumstances prison inmate labor utilized directly by a
grantee (i.e., not employed by a contractor or subcontractor)
in the performance of CDBG-funded construction, would not
be covered by Davis-Bacon wage requirements.
Another exemption may be operable based on the use of bona fide
"volunteers." Section 12(b) of the USHA and Section
110(b) of the HCDA (as enacted by Section 955 of the NAHA) provide
individuals an exemption from Federal prevailing wage requirements
where the individual:
"(1)
performs services for which the individual volunteered;
"(2)(A) does not receive compensation for such services; or
"(B) is paid expenses, reasonable benefits, or a nominal fee
for such services; and
"(3) is not otherwise employed at any time in the construction
work."
Similar
exemptions were provided by the NAHA at Section 286(b)
for the HOME program, and Section 801 which created a provision
for the use of volunteers on section 202 projects at Section
202(j)(5)(B). (See also 24 CFR Part 70, an interim rule published
April 22, 1992, and effective May 22, 1992.)
Prison inmates shall not be considered "volunteers"
for the purposes of these exemption provisions based solely on
their status as inmates. To hold otherwise would result in an
unintended and insupportable expansion of the volunteer exemption
standard. The following guidance, however, discusses limited circumstances
under which a prison inmate may be considered a "volunteer"
under these exemptions. (This guidance is applicable only with
respect to the four statutory exemption provisions identified
above.)
The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) implements a variety of Federal
prison inmate work release programs including Short Term Community
Based Projects (see BOP Operations Memorandum No. 225-91 (7320)
dated October 9, 1991, "Community Services Projects").
Short Term Community Based Projects that are performed outside
the prison institution are considered voluntary program opportunities
provided through furlough provisions under Title 18 U.S.C. 3622(a)(6).
Inmates apply for participation privileges and volunteer
status. Inasmuch as another Federal agency (i.e., BOP) will have
already designated these individuals as "volunteers"
for its own purposes, we have determined that such inmates
may likewise be considered volunteers for the purposes of the
prevailing wage exemption provisions named above.
Prevailing wage exemptions for similar voluntary programs operated
by State or local prisons or other correctional institutions shall
be considered on a case-by-case basis. Where the use of non-Federal
prison inmate "volunteers" is proposed under a State
or local program, the proposal must include a full description
of the programs and intended use and supervision of the inmates
and shall be submitted through the appropriate Field and/or Regional
Office Labor Relations staff to Headquarters Labor Relations for
consideration and decision.
Lastly, there may be instances where persons convicted of certain
offenses may be offered a choice of punishments during
their sentencing phase. These choices may include community service
at a public housing development or other sites and may involve
work that is covered by Federal prevailing wage requirements.
Where such individuals indicate community service as their
sentence of choice, they may also be considered volunteers under
the above provisions and exempt from prevailing wage requirements.
In such cases, a request for approval shall be submitted to the
appropriate Field or Regional Office Labor Relations staff. The
request must include a written statement from an officer of the
Court that the individual has freely chosen a sentence of community
service indicating the number of hours, location and any other
stipulations on such service. Advance consultation by the Field
Labor Relations Director with Regional or Headquarters Labor Relations
staff in approving such requests for community service-volunteer
exemption is recommended.
In all cases where prison inmate labor is utilized under the volunteer
provisions named above, the responsible agency and/or contractor
shall follow the guidance and recordkeeping requirements of 24
CFR Part 70 and Notice 92-01-SL.
Return
to OLR letters
|