|
All lead hazard control grant programs awarded by the OHHLHC require
a combination Risk Assessment and Lead Inspection. So what's the
difference? The table below shows the differences between the two
types of investigations and why we require both to be done.
What's
the Difference between
a Risk Assessment and a Lead Inspection?
|
|
Analysis,
Content or Use
|
Risk
Assessment
|
LBP
Inspection
|
Combination
|
|
Paint
|
Deteriorated
paint only
|
Surface-by-surface
|
Surface-by-surface
includes deteriorated paint
|
|
Dust
|
Yes
|
Optional
|
Yes
|
|
Bare
Soil
|
Yes,
when locality indicates the possibility of soil lead hazards
|
Optional
|
Yes,
when locally indicated
|
|
Water
|
Optional
|
Optional
|
Optional
|
|
Air
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Maintenance
Status
|
Optional
|
No
|
Optional
|
|
Management
Policies and Procedures
|
Optional
|
No
|
Optional
|
|
Review
of Previous Paint Testing
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Typical
Uses
|
1.
Interim controls 2. Building nearing the end of expected life
3. Sale of property or turnover
4. Documentation of absence of lead hazards for insurance
or state requirements
|
1.
Abatement
2. Renovation work
3. Weatherization
4. Sale of property or turnover
5. Remodeling or repainting
|
1.
Addresses presence of LBP and hazards in a comprehensive manner
2. Generates data for decision-making where both interim controls
and abatement strategies may be used in building
3. May be more cost-effective than separate investigations
|
| Final
Report Generated |
Lead
Hazard Control Plan including options for Interim Controls
OR certification of LBP compliance
|
Whether
LBP is present and if so, where (lead concentrations for each
surface tested) |
Presence
and locations of LBP, recommendations for hazard control options
|
|