|
This
information is posted in compliance with Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) 52.102(c)
Subpart
2415.2 --Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Quotations
2415.204
Contract format.
(e)
The cognizant HCA shall be responsible for making exemptions pursuant
to FAR 15.204(e).
2415.209
Solicitation provisions.
(a)
The Contracting Officer shall insert a provision substantially the
same as the provision at 2452.215-70, Proposal Content, in all solicitations
for negotiated procurements using the tradeoff selection process
expected to exceed the simplified acquisition limit. The Contracting
officer shall adapt paragraph (c) of the provision (i.e., include,
delete or further supplement subparagraphs) to address the particular
requirements of the immediate solicitation. The provision may be
used in simplified acquisitions when it is necessary to obtain technical
and management information in making the award selection. When award
selection will be made through the lowest-priced technically acceptable
proposal method, the provision shall be used with its Alternate
I. If the proposed contract requires work on, or access to, sensitive
automated systems or applications (see the clause at 2452.239-70),
the provision shall be used with its Alternate II.
Subpart
2415.3 --Source Selection
2415.303
Responsibilities.
(a)
In accordance with FAR 15.303, the source selection authorities
are designated as follows:
(1)
The Contracting Officer, for contracts awarded using the lowest-priced
technically-acceptable proposal process; and,
(2)
The Assistant Secretary or equivalent for the office initiating
the procurement for contracts awarded using the tradeoff process.
The Assistant Secretary or equivalent may delegate this function
to appropriate departmental personnel.
(3)
For procurements for the performance of legal services by outside
counsel, using either the "lowest-price technically acceptable"
or "tradeoff" approach, the General Counsel or his/her designee.
(b)
The technical requirements related to source selection shall be
performed by a Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). Generally, a TEP
will consist of three to five members, with one member serving as
the chairperson. For procurements involving technical complexity,
the TEP may include advisors and committees to focus on specific
technical areas or concerns. For relatively low dollar value and
routine acquisitions of equipment, supplies or services, the TEP
may consist of one technical representative. The TEP is responsible
for documenting the evaluation of all proposals as appropriate to
the source selection approach in use and for making the source selection
recommendation to the source selection authority.
2415.304
Evaluation factors.
(d)(1)
The solicitation shall state the basis for the source selection
decision as either lowest-priced technically-acceptable
process (LPTA) or trade-off process (as defined at FAR
Subpart 15.1).
2415.305
Proposal evaluation.
(a)
After receipt of proposals, the Contracting Officer will forward
copies of the technical portion of each proposal to the TEP Chairperson
or his or her designee. The cost/price portion of each proposal
shall be retained by the Contracting Officer pending initial technical
evaluation by the TEP.
(3)
Technical evaluation. The TEP shall rate each proposal based
on the evaluation factors specified in the solicitation. The TEP
shall identify each proposal as being either acceptable, unacceptable
but capable of being made acceptable, or unacceptable. A proposal
shall be considered unacceptable if it is so clearly deficient that
it cannot be corrected through written or oral discussions. Under
the trade-off process, predetermined cut-off scores designed to
determine a threshold level of acceptability of proposals shall
not be employed. A technical evaluation report, which complies with
FAR 15.305(a)(3), shall be prepared and signed by the technical
evaluator(s), furnished to the contracting officer, and maintained
as a permanent record in the official procurement file.
2415.308
Source selection decision.
After
receipt and evaluation of final proposal revisions, the TEP shall
document its selection recommendation(s) in a final written report.
The final report shall include sufficient information to support
the recommendation(s) made, appropriate to the source selection
approach and type and complexity of the acquisition.
Subpart
2415.5 - Preaward, Award and Postaward Notifications, Protests and
Mistakes
2415.507
Protests against award.
Protests
against awards of negotiated procurements shall be processed in
accordance with FAR Subpart 33.1 and HUDAR Subpart 2433.1.
Subpart
2415.6 --Unsolicited Proposals
2415.605
Content of unsolicited proposals.
2415.605-70
Unsolicited research proposals.
FAR
Subpart 15.6 outlines the policies and procedures relating to unsolicited
proposals. In addition to these requirements, the Department requires
that each award made as the result of an unsolicited proposal for
research contain a commitment to provide actual cost-sharing. This
provision will be included in the award whether or not cost-sharing
was part of the unsolicited proposal.
2415.606
Agency procedures.
(a)
The contact points shall ensure that unsolicited proposals are controlled,
evaluated, safeguarded and disposed of in accordance with FAR Subpart
15.6. Proposals, as used in this section shall mean proposals for
procurement contracts with the Department and shall not include
proposals or applications for assistance, including grants or cooperative
agreements.
(b)
Unless otherwise specified in a Federal Register announcement, unsolicited
proposals should be submitted to --
(1)
For research: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office
of Policy Development and Research, PD&R Correspondence Unit, 451
Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410-0001.
(2)
For all others: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office
of the Chief Procurement Officer, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington,
DC 20410-0001.
|