August 15, 1990
Susan
L. Rea
Administrative Supervisor
Monmouth County Board of Social Services
P.O. Box 3000
Freehold, N.J. 07728
Dear
Ms. Rea:
Thank
you for your correspondence dated June 5, 1990, regarding your concerns
over the Monmouth County's "Barrier Free Programs" which
receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Your letter
has been referred to me for reply.
It
is my understanding that the CDBG funds are used for removal of
architectural barriers within single- and multi-family residences.
In documenting benefit to low- and moderate-income persons, you
indicate that you have a liberal procedure for barrier free situations
which considers only the income of the disabled person. This is
irrespective of whether it is an elderly person living with his
or her children, a disabled foster child living with foster parents,
a disabled client living with a friend who owns a single family
house, etc.
All
CDBG-funded activities must be eligible and meet one of three national
objectives (benefit to low- and moderate-income persons; prevent
or eliminate slums or blight; or meet urgent community development
needs). Setting the eligibility issue aside, the implementation
of your program could satisfy a national objective under one of
three following conditions:
- Benefit to low-and moderate-income persons within private
single unit residential structure (whether publicly or privately
owned): While the regulation at 570.208(a)(2)(i)(A) provides
that handicapped persons are presumed to be low- and moderate-income
persons, absent substantial evidence to the contrary, this presumption
does not extend to removal of architectural barriers within
single-unit dwellings which are considered improvements to permanent
residential structures (570.208(a)(2)(i) and (a)(3)). In such
cases, the household income must be low or moderate in order
to qualify under this national objective. For purposes of the
CDBG program, a "household" is defined at 570.3(n)
as "all
the persons who occupy a housing unit. The occupants may be
a single family, one person living alone, two or more families
living together, or any other group of related or unrelated
persons who share living arrangements."
This
means that removal of architectural barriers within private
residential structures would require the income of the entire
household to be taken into consideration in determining whether
the activity would be a benefit to low- and moderate-income
persons. However, it is the income of the household occupying
the unit that is rehabilitated that matters, whether or not
the unit owner(s) are members of that household.
For
removal of architectural barriers within some or all of the
dwelling units of a multi-family structure, at least 51% of
the units in the structure must be occupied by low- and moderate-income
persons (570.208(a)(3)). HUD would consider a waiver of the
regulations in instances where each residential unit to be rehabilitated
within the multi-family structure would be occupied by a low-
and moderate-income household upon completion of the architectural
barrier removal.
- Benefit
to low- and moderate-income persons for removal of architectural
barriers in the common areas of residential structures containing
more that one dwelling unit: The regulations extend the presumption
of low- and moderate-income status to handicapped persons as
a group when architectural barriers are removed in the common
areas of residential structures containing more than one dwelling
unit. This regulation at 570.208(a)(2)(ii) would permit, for
example, the installation of a pushbutton egress system on the
exit doors of an apartment complex. In such cases, income information
is not required, since the benefit is for handicapped persons
generally, and not just for those living in the building.
- Removal
of architectural barriers to prevent or eliminate slums or blight
on an area basis: The activity may qualify under this national
objective only under limited circumstances which require that
the structure must be substandard (as defined locally) and the
work includes the correction of all deficiencies that make the
structure substandard (570.208(b)(i)). In such cases, the income
of the household is not a deciding factor. However, this provision
does not permit removal of an architectural barrier by itself
without additional rehabilitation work that meets the regulatory
criteria of this section. This section of the regulation also
carries with it other requirements that include, among other
things, the designation of the area as slum or blighted by the
grantee and the presence of a substantial number of deteriorated
or deteriorating buildings or improvements throughout the area.
For
informational purposes, the CDBG regulations do not define what
constitutes income although such a definition is being considered.
To qualify an activity as a CDBG low- and moderate-income benefit,
a household must have an income equal to or less than the lower
income limits established for family size equal to the size
of the household, under the section 8 Housing Assistance Payments
Program. The definition of "household" has already
been discussed. The Section 8 program does specify a method
for determining annual income (at 24 CFR 813.106) which you
may wish to use for this purpose, although it is not required.
Under the Section 8 program, for handicapped persons who have
a "live-in aide", as defined at 813.102, it is not
required to include the income of such persons who meet this
definition. You may want to keep this in mind for clients of
your "Barrier Free" program to whom this could apply.
Using
one of the three methods outlined above will enable your "Barrier
Free" program to comply with the CDBG national objective requirements.
While it may not permit your program to assist all handicapped citizens
in Monmouth County, the CDBG program is designed primarily to benefit
low-and moderate-income persons. Under the CDBG program, a low-
and moderate-income person is defined as a member of a low- and
moderate-income family. Recent proposals to increase the overall
percentage of CDBG funds that must be used to benefit low- and moderate-income
persons clearly underscore our desire to use scarce resources for
the truly needy. As stated previously, HUD would consider a waiver
under the circumstances described in # 1 above.
I
hope that you will find this information useful for assessing your
local program. If you have additional questions, please do not hesitate
to contact Mr. Joshua Dancy, Rehabilitation Management Specialist,
at our HUD office in Newark, at 60 Park Place, Newark, New Jersey,
07102-5504. His telephone number is (201) 877-1752. A copy of this
letter is being sent to him. Thank you for your interest in the
proper and effective administration of CDBG funded activities.
Very sincerely yours,
Russell K. Paul
Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Program Management