|
Under
the Lead Safe Housing Rule, grantees may choose not to perform a
risk assessment or paint testing and, instead, presume that lead-based
paint and/or hazards are present. This option can be cost effective
in cases where lead-based paint is likely to be present.
The
consequences of presuming are different, depending on the lead hazard
evaluation and reduction requirements.
-
For rehab up to $5000 per unit, the grantee may skip the paint
testing and presume all painted surfaces being worked on have
lead-based paint. In this case, workers must use lead
safe work practices on all the painted surfaces they work
on and perform clearance
when work is complete.
-
For rehabilitation projects over $5,000 up to $25,000 per unit,
the grantee may skip the risk assessment and presume lead based
paint and lead hazards are present. To address the presumed
hazards, the grantee must perform standard
treatments.
-
For rehabilitation over $25,000 per unit), the grantee may skip
the risk assessment and presume lead hazards are present. In
this case, the grantee must perform abatement
on all potential lead hazards - deteriorated, impact, friction,
chewable surfaces, as well as surfaces to be disturbed.
Option
to Test
Grantees
also always have the option to test limited surfaces to rule out
lead-based paint on those surfaces. For example, after a visual
assessment, the grantee may choose to test deteriorated surfaces
to determine if those surfaces have lead-based paint.
|