Topic
Overview
When
deciding whether to undertake an energy saving improvement, a Grantee/owner
will want to justify the cost of purchasing and installing the new
equipment. While the potential to reduce energy costs is often the
most compelling reason a Grantee or an owner might undertake an
energy efficiency method, the ability to reduce operating costs
while addressing capital improvement needs is also of importance.
For example, by replacing an old inefficient furnace with a new
energy efficient furnace, an owner addresses a capital improvement
need while reducing energy costs.
After
completing this topic, you will be able to:
- Explain HUD's energy guidelines;
- Define payback period;
- Calculate the payback period of an energy efficiency measure;
and
- List the various methods one can use to calculate the relative
cost effectiveness of installing various types of energy efficient
equipment.
Specifically,
this topic will cover:
- Energy
Advisor. HUD has established guidelines to assist HUD grantees
to determine whether a particular energy efficiency measure
is cost effective.
-
Payback Period.
The most commonly used method of measuring the cost effectiveness
of energy efficiency measures. Explains how to determine the
payback period for a project.
-
Payback
Period Calculation Introduction. Explains how to calculate
the payback period of purchasing a new furnace.
- Payback
Period Example 1. A calculation of the payback period
of replacing a broken furnace with a new energy efficient
model.
- Payback
Period Example 2. A calculation of the payback period
of replacing a working inefficient furnace with a new energy
efficient model.
-
Key Points to Consider.
Outlines the important items to take into consideration when
assessing if an energy efficiency measure is cost effective
- Other
Methods to Assess Cost Effectiveness.
Describes other methods that can be used to determine if an
energy efficiency measure or project is cost-effective.
|