 |
 |

Developing a Monitoring Plan
|
 |
|
|
|
Effective
monitoring is not a one-time event, but an ongoing process of planning,
implementation, communication, and follow-up. As a result, a PJ's
HOME monitoring activities are most effective when distributed throughout
its program year. Monitoring involves many people from inside and
outside the agency and requires detailed information, reports, meetings,
and documentation. Not only must PJs monitor organizations they
have entrusted with HOME funds, but they should also conduct internal
monitoring to ensure the local HOME program is being administered
correctly. Many of the monitoring methods in the HOME Check-up can
be used for both types of monitoring activities.
To organize
all of its monitoring efforts, a PJ should develop an annual monitoring
plan that can serve as a readily accessible guide for the people
and organizations involved. A written monitoring plan can facilitate
the wisest use of limited resources.
Elements of an Annual Monitoring Plan
An
annual monitoring plan should articulate the PJ's strategy for conducting
a thorough review to determine that all activities are meeting HOME
regulatory requirements. The plan should be practical and allow
the PJ to monitor successfully with the staff and time resources
available.
The
annual monitoring plan should address a number of areas:
|
Monitoring
Objectives and Strategy. The plan should identify the PJ's
monitoring goals and strategies, highlighting areas to which
staff should pay special attention during the monitoring year.
|
|
Ongoing
Monitoring. The plan should clearly identify the check-points
that ensure a minimum level of review for all activities during
the year and the scope and frequency of those reviews. This
component should identify specific reports to be generated and
reviews to be conducted, as well as establishing the frequency
and timing of such reviews.
|
|
Monitoring
Staff and Schedule. The plan should include a schedule of
when monitoring reviews will be performed and by whom. To the
extent that staff other than the monitoring staff is responsible
for any particular reviews, this should be articulated.
|
|
In-Depth
Monitoring. The plan should also identify the program areas
and partners that will be subject to in-depth, on-site reviews
during the coming monitoring year. (The process of selecting
entities for on-site reviews is discussed as part of this subject.)
|
|
Follow-Up
Activities. The plan should detail procedures for communicating
the results of reviews with internal (PJ) and external (other
organizations being monitored) staff and the methods for obtaining
and incorporating their feedback.
|
|
Coordination.
Finally, the plan should describe the necessary coordination
between PJ staff and the staff of other organizations. The plan
should also describe the procedures that monitoring staff will
follow when informing other HOME program staff about compliance
problems. |
|