[Logo: Homes and Communities: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development] Commmunity Planning and Development
[Vea la versi�n en espa�ol de esta p�gina] [Contact Us] [Display the text version of this page] [Search/Index]
 
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Community Planning and Development
 - About CPD
 - Consolidated Planning
 - Conplan Improvement Initiative
 - Working Groups

HUD news

Homes

Resources

Communities

Working with HUD

Tools
Webcasts
Mailing lists
RSS Feeds
Help

[The U.S. government's official web portal]  

Counties Working Group

- -
 Information by State
 Print version
 
-
Working Groups
-
 -   States
 -   Consortia
 -   Counties
 -   Cities (CDBG-only)
 -   Cities (multi-funded)
 -   Technology
 -   Steering Committee

-
Want More Information?
-
 -   Counties Working Group Membership List

-
Jump To...
-
 -   September 22, 2002
 -   August 26, 2002
 -   August 15, 2002
 -   August 8, 2002
 -   July 19, 2002
 -   July 2, 2002

Summary of ConPlan Improvement Initiative Counties Working Group Conference Calls

Conference Call Summary Notes (revised)
Monday August 26, 2002, 1:30 PM (EST)

Participants:
Co-Chairs: John Perry (HUD - Atlanta Field Office) and Norma Drummond (Westchester Co., NY)
Members: Kristina Rogers (Conifer Realty), Fran Lunney (Arlington Co, VA), Leslie Suarez (NACCED).
Aspen/ComCon staff: Grace Morris

The group discussed performance measurement. It was offered that Arlington County, VA., tried to identify items and came up with 180 strategies. That has since been reduced to 90 but clearly it shows that quantity of activities will be an issue when attempting to identify measures. Arlington County offered to be a link under CPII references. The group agreed that most grantees do several common things with their funds which could be reported upon at a national level.

It was raised that HUD only should need to tell Congress a few simple things: Money - what kind was spent, how much and on what? People - who was helped?

HUD, it was suggested, needs to come up with a reporting format, possibly a matrix if it is easy for HUD and the public to follow, especially for the CAPER. It was suggested that a sample CAPER document would be more helpful than a checklist. CAPER submission should be all electronic.

HUD needs to ask the right questions. Because grantees want to spend their time on activities and not on reporting, they usually prefer to submit the minimum amount required.

It was suggested that it would also be helpful if HUD developed some icons that could be used to represent certain activities and those could become the universal symbols used for reporting.

It was suggested that "best practices" would be very helpful especially for communities with small staffs and/or high staff turn over. Communities could be requested to submit their shining examples which could be abstracted and posted on the web. For instance if a community administers a youth program, it is more important to know the reduced rate of drop-outs, pregnancies, etc and not just the number participating in the program. Westchester County, NY offered that they develop an annual calendar to show before and after pictures of their projects so that people will actually see what the program is all about. Arlington County uses a teen photography program to show their outcomes. There is a need to market the programs.

The group will meet again at the NACCED conference in Westchester County, NY on Sunday, September 22 to review and discuss the County submission of ideas.

 
Content current as of 17 July 2009   Follow this link to go  Back to Top   
----------
FOIA Privacy Web Policies and Important Links  Home [logo: Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity]
[Logo: HUD seal] U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
451 7th Street S.W., Washington, DC 20410
Telephone: (202) 708-1112   TTY: (202) 708-1455
Find the address of a HUD office near you